Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
SCHP vs XLV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SCHP returned −0.8% to XLV's +25.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about SCHP and XLV
Net assets: $16.5bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF, and $47.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHP costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 26.4 points.
| Measure | SCHP | XLV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −0.8% | +25.6% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | US TIPS | Health Care Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, SCHP as of Jun 30, 2026 and XLV as of Oct 27, 2026 | $16.5bn | $47.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 60.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Aug 13, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 845 weekly returnsXLV returned more: +711.8% to +52.2%. SCHP swung less: 5.5% to 15.7%. SCHP fell less at its worst: −14.0% to −24.3%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | SCHP | XLV | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +52.2% | +711.8% | XLV | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +2.6% | +13.8% | XLV | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +1.8% | +516.1% | XLV | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 5.5% | 15.7% | SCHP | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 4.0% | 10.7% | SCHP | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −14.0% | −24.3% | SCHP | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.21 | 0.80 | XLV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.29 | 1.17 | XLV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.19 | 0.57 | XLV | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 845 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, SCHP and XLV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
SCHP and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.
SCHP
SCHP tracks an index of US TIPS. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
XLV
XLV tracks an index of Health care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 62 positions, with the top ten at 60.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHP or XLV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHP returned −0.8% and XLV +25.6%.
- Which is cheaper, SCHP or XLV?
- SCHP is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SCHP against XLV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schp-vs-xlv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). SCHP against XLV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schp-vs-xlv
[SCHP against XLV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schp-vs-xlv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.