Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
SCHG vs VO: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SCHG returned +6.8% to VO's +12.8%; 13% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about SCHG and VO
Net assets: $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF, and $103.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
VO costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.0 points.
| Measure | SCHG | VO |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +6.8% | +12.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 3.1%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index | Morningstar US Mid Cap Index (formerly CRSP US Mid Cap Index) |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 and VO as of Sep 30, 2026 | $63.0bn | $103.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 13% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 51.0% | 9.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and VO hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
13% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
SCHG and VO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHG and VO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index and VO follows Morningstar US Mid Cap Index (formerly CRSP US Mid Cap Index).
- Holdings in common. 13% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 SCHG returned +6.8% and VO +12.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 6.0 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VO
VO tracks an index of Mid-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 273 positions, with the top ten at 9.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or VO?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +6.8% and VO +12.8%.
- Which is cheaper, SCHG or VO?
- VO is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SCHG against VO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-vo
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). SCHG against VO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-vo
[SCHG against VO (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-vo)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.