Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
VO vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VO returned +12.8% to VONG's +1.1%; 9% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about VO and VONG
Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $103.4bn for Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF and $47.1bn for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
VO costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.7 points; VO is 2.2 times larger.
| Measure | VO | VONG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +12.8% | +1.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.1%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Morningstar US Mid Cap Index (formerly CRSP US Mid Cap Index) | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $103.4bn | $47.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 9% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 9.7% | 57.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, VO and VONG hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.
half
9% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
VO and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VO and VONG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. VO follows Morningstar US Mid Cap Index (formerly CRSP US Mid Cap Index) and VONG follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 9% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 VO returned +12.8% and VONG +1.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.7 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
VO
VO tracks an index of Mid-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 273 positions, with the top ten at 9.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VONG
VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VO or VONG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VO returned +12.8% and VONG +1.1%.
- Which is cheaper, VO or VONG?
- VO is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, VO against VONG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vo-vs-vong
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). VO against VONG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vo-vs-vong
[VO against VONG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vo-vs-vong)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.