Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MOAT vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MOAT returned +10.3% to SCHG's +6.8%; 16% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MOAT and SCHG
Net assets: $11.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHG costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.5 points.
| Measure | MOAT | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +10.3% | +6.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.7%, high on Aug 27, 2026 | 3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.46% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, MOAT as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 | $11.6bn | $63.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 16% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 26.5% | 51.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and SCHG hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
16% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
MOAT and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MOAT and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. MOAT follows Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
- Holdings in common. 16% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MOAT returned +10.3% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.5 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
MOAT
MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or SCHG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +10.3% and SCHG +6.8%.
- Which is cheaper, MOAT or SCHG?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MOAT against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/moat-vs-schg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MOAT against SCHG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/moat-vs-schg
[MOAT against SCHG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/moat-vs-schg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.