Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GARP vs MOAT: how they differ

GARP and MOAT hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and MOAT hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GARP and MOAT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGARPMOAT
MICROSOFT5.16%2.79%
NVIDIA5.09%2.58%
BROADCOM INC1.76%2.23%
FORTINET1.49%2.19%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC2.33%1.41%
MERCADOLIBRE2.07%1.39%
AMAZON.COM INC2.07%1.36%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A4.81%1.29%
AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A1.28%1.31%
AIRBNB CLASS A0.83%2.88%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS0.60%2.40%
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL0.55%1.45%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GARPOnly in MOAT
APPLE 5.23%Veeva Systems Inc 3.41%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 4.76%Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.75%
VISA CLASS A 4.60%Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.58%
LAM RESEARCH 4.02%Estee Lauder Cos Inc/The 2.52%
CATERPILLAR INC 3.65%Danaher Corp 2.44%
KLA 3.50%Mondelez International Inc 2.43%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 2.34%Brown-Forman Corp 2.39%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.28%Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc 2.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

GARP and MOAT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanEck
What it isMSCI USA Quality GARPMorningstar Wide Moat
Total return, 1 year+29.5%+11.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+12.0 pts−6.2 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.46%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%91.6%
Holdings13355

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 133 positions, with the top ten at 43.2%.

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 27.1%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or MOAT?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and MOAT returned +11.3%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GARP or MOAT?
GARP charges 0.15% a year and MOAT charges 0.46%, so GARP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and MOAT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 92% of MOAT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 18% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GARP against MOAT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against MOAT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/garp-vs-moat Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources