Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
SCHG vs USHY: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SCHG returned +6.8% to USHY's +1.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about SCHG and USHY
Net assets: $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF, and $26.3bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHG costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.1 points.
| Measure | SCHG | USHY |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +6.8% | +1.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index | ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 and USHY as of Oct 27, 2026 | $63.0bn | $26.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 95% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 51.0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and USHY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
SCHG and USHY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
USHY
USHY tracks an index of Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against +1.8% for its benchmark, the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index, measured by the closely related ICE BofA US High Yield Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or USHY?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +6.8% and USHY +1.7%.
- Which is cheaper, SCHG or USHY?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SCHG against USHY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-ushy
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). SCHG against USHY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-ushy
[SCHG against USHY (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-ushy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.