Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

SCHF vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SCHF returned +17.6% to SCHG's +6.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SCHF and SCHG

Net assets on Aug 31, 2026: $69.7bn for Schwab International Equity ETF and $63.0bn for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+17.6%
SCHF total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
0.03%
SCHF expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHF costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.8 points; SCHF is 1.1 times larger.

SCHF vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSCHFSCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year+17.6%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high4.4%, high on Aug 25, 20263.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE Developed ex US IndexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.04%
Net assets, as of Aug 31, 2026$69.7bn$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund13.8%51.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 879 weekly returns
SCHF SCHG
Return
Total return edge SCHG +231.0% +1,156.7%
Annualized edge SCHG +7.3% +16.2%
Price return edge SCHG +112.3% +988.8%
Risk
Volatility edge SCHF (slight) 17.1% 18.5%
Max drawdown edge Tie −33.8% −34.2%
Downside capture 99.0% 108.1%
Beta 0.99 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SCHG 0.41 0.82
Sortino edge SCHG 0.58 1.22
Treynor 0.069 0.138
Calmar edge SCHG 0.22 0.47
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.5% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.02 0.65
Information ratio 0.20 0.40
Tracking error 1.9% 5.5%

Each against its own benchmark: SCHF against EFA, Nov 13, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHG against IVV, Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SCHG returned more: +1,156.7% to +231.0%. SCHF swung slightly less: 17.1% to 18.5%. SCHF and SCHG fell about the same at their worst: −33.8% and −34.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: SCHF vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSCHFSCHGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+231.0%+1,156.7%SCHGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+7.3%+16.2%SCHGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+112.3%+988.8%SCHGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.1%18.5%SCHF (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.2%12.5%SCHF (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−33.8%−34.2%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.2%121.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.0%108.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.991.10Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.990.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.410.82SCHGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.581.22SCHGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0690.138Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.220.47SCHGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkEFAIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.5% a year+0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.020.65Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +1.4%−1.7% to +3.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.200.40Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.9%5.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 879 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, SCHF and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first SCHF SCHG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in SCHF
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 2.88%
SK hynix Inc 2.23%
ASML Holding NV 2.14%
HSBC Holdings PLC 1.17%
Roche Holding AG 1.00%
Royal Bank of Canada 0.94%
Novartis AG 0.94%
Shell PLC 0.83%
Only in SCHG
NVIDIA Corp 10.67%
Apple Inc 9.29%
Microsoft Corp 7.52%
Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
Alphabet Inc 3.97%
Broadcom Inc 3.50%
Alphabet Inc 3.16%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.93%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Schwab Schwab
What it is Tracks an index of International Equity Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +17.6% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +12.1% (EFA) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +5.5 pts vs EFA −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 94.7%
Holdings 1475 192
Net assets, as of Aug 31, 2026 $69.7bn $63.0bn

SCHF and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-7F23DEA0A2

SCHF and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. SCHF follows FTSE Developed ex US Index and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 SCHF returned +17.6% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SCHF

SCHF tracks an index of International Equity. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +12.1% for its benchmark, the MSCI EAFE Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,475 positions, with the top ten at 13.8%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHF or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHF returned +17.6% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, SCHF or SCHG?
SCHF is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHF and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of SCHF and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SCHF against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schf-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.