Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

SCHF vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SCHF returned +17.6% to VONG's +1.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SCHF and VONG

Net assets: $69.7bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab International Equity ETF, and $47.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+17.6%
SCHF total return, 1 year
+1.1%
VONG total return, 1 year
0.03%
SCHF expense ratio
0.06%
VONG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHF costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.5 points.

SCHF vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSCHFVONG
Return
Total return, 1 year+17.6%+1.1%
Drawdown
Below its high4.4%, high on Aug 25, 20264.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE Developed ex US IndexRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.06%
Net assets, SCHF as of Aug 31, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026$69.7bn$47.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund13.8%57.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 838 weekly returns
SCHF VONG
Return
Total return edge VONG +215.4% +1,017.5%
Annualized edge VONG +7.4% +16.2%
Price return edge VONG +102.6% +840.0%
Risk
Volatility edge SCHF (slight) 16.8% 17.9%
Max drawdown edge VONG (slight) −33.8% −32.5%
Downside capture 99.0% 99.8%
Beta 0.99 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VONG 0.41 0.84
Sortino edge VONG 0.58 1.25
Treynor 0.069 0.151
Calmar edge VONG 0.22 0.50
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.5% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.02 0.76
Information ratio 0.20 0.11
Tracking error 1.9% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: SCHF against EFA, Nov 13, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026; VONG against IWF, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VONG returned more: +1,017.5% to +215.4%. SCHF swung slightly less: 16.8% to 17.9%. VONG fell slightly less at its worst: −32.5% to −33.8%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: SCHF vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSCHFVONGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+215.4%+1,017.5%VONGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+7.4%+16.2%VONGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+102.6%+840.0%VONGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.8%17.9%SCHF (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.9%12.0%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−33.8%−32.5%VONG (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.2%99.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.0%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.990.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.991.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.410.84VONGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.581.25VONGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0690.151Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.220.50VONGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkEFAIWFThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.5% a year+0.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.020.76Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +1.4%−0.3% to +0.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.200.11Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.9%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 838 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, SCHF and VONG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first SCHF VONG
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd 0.06% 0.04%
Restaurant Brands International Inc 0.09% 0.04%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in SCHF
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 2.88%
SK hynix Inc 2.23%
ASML Holding NV 2.14%
HSBC Holdings PLC 1.17%
Roche Holding AG 1.00%
Royal Bank of Canada 0.94%
Novartis AG 0.94%
Shell PLC 0.83%
Only in VONG
NVIDIA Corp 15.63%
Apple Inc 7.65%
Alphabet Inc 5.88%
Microsoft Corp 5.59%
Broadcom Inc 4.79%
Alphabet Inc 4.75%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.83%
Micron Technology Inc 3.52%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of International Equity Tracks the Russell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year +17.6% +1.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +12.1% (EFA) +0.9% (IWF)
Gap to its benchmark +5.5 pts vs EFA +0.2 pts vs IWF
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 95.5%
Holdings 1475 373
Net assets, SCHF as of Aug 31, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026 $69.7bn $47.1bn

SCHF and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-8C6BC349A7

SCHF and VONG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. SCHF follows FTSE Developed ex US Index and VONG follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 SCHF returned +17.6% and VONG +1.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 16.5 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SCHF

SCHF tracks an index of International Equity. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +12.1% for its benchmark, the MSCI EAFE Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,475 positions, with the top ten at 13.8%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VONG

VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHF or VONG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHF returned +17.6% and VONG +1.1%.
Which is cheaper, SCHF or VONG?
SCHF is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHF and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of SCHF and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SCHF against VONG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schf-vs-vong

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.