RWK vs SDY: how they differ
RWK and SDY hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and RWK returned +15.9% over the year. Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF and State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF.
SDY costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.9 points; SDY is 16.2 times larger.
| RWK | SDY | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, RWK as of Oct 9, 2026 and SDY as of Oct 8, 2026 | $1.3bn | $20.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.9% | +10.0% |
| Holdings in common | 5% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.9% | 20.5% |
| Below its high | 6.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 5.8%, high on Aug 24, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, RWK and SDY hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
half
5% in common
On the same fields
RWK and SDY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RWK in plain words
RWK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 20.9%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
SDY in plain words
SDY tracks the S&P Dividend. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +10.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 156 positions, with the top ten at 20.5%. It sat 5.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, RWK or SDY?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RWK returned +15.9% and SDY +10.0%.
- Which is cheaper, RWK or SDY?
- SDY is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $4. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, RWK against SDY, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rwk-vs-sdy
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). RWK against SDY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rwk-vs-sdy
[RWK against SDY (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rwk-vs-sdy)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.