RPG vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
RPG and VONG hold 29% of their weight in the same names, and RPG returned +15.5% over the year. Net assets: $1.8bn on Oct 20, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF, and $47.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
VONG costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.4 points.
| RPG | VONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, RPG as of Oct 20, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026 | $1.8bn | $47.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.5% | +4.1% |
| What it tracks | S&P 500 Pure Growth Index | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 29% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 29.3% | 57.6% |
| Below its high | 13.9%, high on Jun 30, 2026 | 5.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
RPG and VONG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. RPG follows S&P 500 Pure Growth Index and VONG follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 29% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 19, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 RPG returned +15.5% and VONG +4.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.4 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, RPG and VONG hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
29% in common
On the same fields
RPG and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About RPG
RPG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested, against +15.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 70 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 13.9% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About VONG
VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, RPG or VONG?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RPG returned +15.5% and VONG +4.1%.
- Which is cheaper, RPG or VONG?
- VONG is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, RPG against VONG, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rpg-vs-vong
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). RPG against VONG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rpg-vs-vong
[RPG against VONG (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rpg-vs-vong)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.