Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

QQQM vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QQQM returned +15.2% to VONG's +1.1%; 59% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QQQM and VONG

Net assets: $110.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF, and $47.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
+1.1%
VONG total return, 1 year
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio
0.06%
VONG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VONG costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.1 points.

QQQM vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQQQMVONG
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.2%+1.1%
Drawdown
Below its high4.5%, high on Oct 6, 20264.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNasdaq-100 IndexRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.06%
Net assets, QQQM as of Oct 27, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026$110.4bn$47.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common59%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund46.7%57.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 313 weekly returns
QQQM VONG
Return
Total return edge QQQM +157.2% +124.0%
Annualized edge QQQM +17.0% +14.3%
Price return edge QQQM +147.9% +115.1%
Risk
Volatility edge VONG (slight) 21.0% 20.2%
Max drawdown edge VONG (slight) −35.0% −32.5%
Downside capture 99.8% 99.8%
Beta 1.00 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QQQM 0.70 0.60
Sortino edge QQQM 1.07 0.92
Treynor 0.147 0.151
Calmar edge QQQM (slight) 0.49 0.44
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.1% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.62 0.76
Information ratio 0.10 0.11
Tracking error 0.4% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: QQQM against QQQ, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; VONG against IWF, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QQQM returned more: +157.2% to +124.0%. VONG swung slightly less: 20.2% to 21.0%. VONG fell slightly less at its worst: −32.5% to −35.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: QQQM vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQQQMVONGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+157.2%+124.0%QQQMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+17.0%+14.3%QQQMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+147.9%+115.1%QQQMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.0%20.2%VONG (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.6%13.2%VONG (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−35.0%−32.5%VONG (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.6%99.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.8%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.000.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.700.60QQQMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.070.92QQQMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1470.151Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.490.44QQQM (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkQQQIWFThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.1% a year+0.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.620.76Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.2% to +0.4%−0.3% to +0.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.100.11Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.4%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 313 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

59%

By the books each fund has filed, QQQM and VONG hold 59% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

59% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QQQM VONG
NVIDIA Corp 8.17% 15.63%
Apple Inc 7.88% 7.65%
Microsoft Corp 6.14% 5.59%
Micron Technology Inc 4.50% 3.52%
Tesla Inc 3.33% 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.93% 5.88%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93% 2.92%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.87% 3.83%
Alphabet Inc 2.72% 4.75%
Broadcom Inc 2.53% 4.79%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.96% 1.22%
Lam Research Corp 1.29% 1.21%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in QQQM
Intel Corp 2.12%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.89%
Linde PLC 1.01%
Shopify Inc 0.86%
Gilead Sciences Inc 0.85%
QUALCOMM Inc 0.83%
T-Mobile US Inc 0.68%
ASML Holding NV 0.66%
Only in VONG
Eli Lilly & Co 2.71%
Visa Inc 1.69%
Mastercard Inc 1.31%
Caterpillar Inc 1.08%
General Electric Co 0.95%
GE Vernova Inc 0.75%
Oracle Corp 0.69%
Arista Networks Inc 0.62%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Nasdaq-100 Tracks the Russell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year +15.2% +1.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +15.2% (QQQ) +0.9% (IWF)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs QQQ +0.2 pts vs IWF
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 95.7% 95.5%
Holdings 105 373
Net assets, QQQM as of Oct 27, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026 $110.4bn $47.1bn

QQQM and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-F8D46613DF

QQQM and VONG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index and VONG follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 QQQM returned +15.2% and VONG +1.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 14.1 points.
  3. Number of holdings. QQQM holds 105 positions and VONG holds 373.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QQQM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VONG

VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQM or VONG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQM returned +15.2% and VONG +1.1%.
Which is cheaper, QQQM or VONG?
VONG is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQM and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of QQQM and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QQQM against VONG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqqm-vs-vong

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.