Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

QQQM vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QQQM returned +15.2% to SCHG's +6.8%; 59% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QQQM and SCHG

Net assets: $110.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHG costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.4 points.

QQQM vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQQQMSCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.2%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high4.5%, high on Oct 6, 20263.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNasdaq-100 IndexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.04%
Net assets, QQQM as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026$110.4bn$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common59%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund46.7%51.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 313 weekly returns
QQQM SCHG
Return
Total return edge QQQM +157.2% +140.9%
Annualized edge QQQM (slight) +17.0% +15.7%
Price return edge QQQM (slight) +147.9% +134.3%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 21.0% 21.0%
Max drawdown edge SCHG (slight) −35.0% −34.2%
Downside capture 99.8% 108.1%
Beta 1.00 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QQQM (slight) 0.70 0.64
Sortino edge QQQM (slight) 1.07 0.99
Treynor 0.147 0.138
Calmar edge QQQM (slight) 0.49 0.46
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.1% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.62 0.65
Information ratio 0.10 0.40
Tracking error 0.4% 5.5%

Each against its own benchmark: QQQM against QQQ, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHG against IVV, Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QQQM returned more: +157.2% to +140.9%. QQQM and SCHG swung about the same: 21.0% and 21.0%. SCHG fell slightly less at its worst: −34.2% to −35.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: QQQM vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQQQMSCHGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+157.2%+140.9%QQQMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+17.0%+15.7%QQQM (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+147.9%+134.3%QQQM (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.0%21.0%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.6%13.6%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−35.0%−34.2%SCHG (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.6%121.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.8%108.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.10Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.700.64QQQM (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.070.99QQQM (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1470.138Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.490.46QQQM (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkQQQIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.1% a year+0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.620.65Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.2% to +0.4%−1.7% to +3.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.100.40Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.4%5.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 313 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

59%

By the books each fund has filed, QQQM and SCHG hold 59% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

59% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QQQM SCHG
NVIDIA Corp 8.17% 10.67%
Apple Inc 7.88% 9.29%
Microsoft Corp 6.14% 7.52%
Amazon.com Inc 4.25% 5.07%
Alphabet Inc 2.93% 3.97%
Alphabet Inc 2.72% 3.16%
Broadcom Inc 2.53% 3.50%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.87% 2.51%
Tesla Inc 3.33% 2.37%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93% 2.37%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.96% 1.65%
Costco Wholesale Corp 1.89% 1.61%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in QQQM
Micron Technology Inc 4.50%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 2.74%
Walmart Inc 2.49%
Intel Corp 2.12%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.89%
Applied Materials Inc 1.35%
Lam Research Corp 1.29%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.21%
Only in SCHG
Eli Lilly & Co 2.93%
Visa Inc 2.43%
Mastercard Inc 1.83%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.36%
General Electric Co 1.35%
GE Vernova Inc 0.93%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 0.88%
Salesforce Inc 0.81%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Nasdaq-100 Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +15.2% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +15.2% (QQQ) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs QQQ −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 95.7% 94.7%
Holdings 105 192
Net assets, QQQM as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 $110.4bn $63.0bn

QQQM and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-537545F9C5

QQQM and SCHG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 QQQM returned +15.2% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.4 points.
  3. Cost. QQQM charges 0.15% of assets a year and SCHG 0.04%, a gap of 0.11 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QQQM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQM or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQM returned +15.2% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, QQQM or SCHG?
SCHG is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQM and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of QQQM and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QQQM against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqqm-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.