Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
REMX vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, REMX returned −19.2% to VT's +13.5%, and VT charges 0.06% to REMX's 0.53%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about REMX and VTNet assets: $1.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF, and $81.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
VT costs 0.47 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 32.7 points.
| Measure | REMX | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −19.2% | +13.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 75.1%, high on Apr 11, 2011 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Rare earth and critical materials | FTSE Global All Cap Index |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 32.6 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.53% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, REMX as of Oct 27, 2026 and VT as of Sep 30, 2026 | $1.5bn | $81.8bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 61% | 22.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, REMX and VT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
REMX and VT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
REMX
By weight, 9% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 32 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −19.2% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 32.6 pts. It sits 75.1% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.
VT
VT tracks an index of Total World Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10,194 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
Questions people ask
- Are REMX and VT in the same category?
- REMX is a thematic ETF and VT is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, REMX or VT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, REMX returned −19.2% and VT +13.5%.
- Which is cheaper, REMX or VT?
- VT is cheaper, by 0.47 percentage points a year. That is about $47 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, REMX against VT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/remx-vs-vt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). REMX against VT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/remx-vs-vt
[REMX against VT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/remx-vs-vt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.