Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
EWY vs REMX: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWY returned +79.7% to REMX's −19.2%, and REMX charges 0.53% to EWY's 0.59%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EWY and REMX
Net assets: $24.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF, and $1.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF.
Pair scorecard
REMX costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 98.9 points; EWY is 14.8 times larger.
| Measure | EWY | REMX |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +79.7% | −19.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 24.3%, high on Jun 18, 2026 | |
| Below its all-time high | 75.1%, high on Apr 11, 2011 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped Index | Rare earth and critical materials |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 32.6 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.53% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 23, 2026 | $22.2bn | $1.5bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 60.9% | 61% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 5, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 833 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: EWY against EEM, Apr 25, 2003 to Oct 23, 2026; REMX against ACWI, Nov 5, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.
EWY returned more: +241.6% to −68.2%. EWY swung less: 26.3% to 35.3%. EWY fell less at its worst: −49.7% to −89.2%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | EWY | REMX | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +241.6% | −68.2% | EWY | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +8.0% | −6.9% | EWY | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +163.3% | −79.7% | EWY | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 26.3% | 35.3% | EWY | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 18.0% | 24.5% | EWY | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −49.7% | −89.2% | EWY | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 115.0% | 129.3% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 103.2% | 133.0% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.08 | 1.43 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.74 | 0.42 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.36 | −0.07 | EWY | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.53 | −0.10 | EWY | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.124 | −0.018 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.16 | −0.08 | EWY | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | EEM | ACWI | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +2.5% a year | −15.8% a year | EWY not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.83 | −2.33 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −3.4% to +8.5% | −29.0% to −2.5% | EWY includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.22 | −0.42 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 14.8% | 27.8% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 833 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EWY and REMX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
EWY and REMX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EWY and REMX do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. EWY follows MSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped Index and REMX follows Rare earth and critical materials.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWY returned +79.7% and REMX −19.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 98.9 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
EWY
EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
REMX
By weight, 9% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 32 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −19.2% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 32.6 pts. It sits 75.1% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Are EWY and REMX in the same category?
- EWY is a stock ETF and REMX is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, EWY or REMX?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +79.7% and REMX −19.2%.
- Which is cheaper, EWY or REMX?
- REMX is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EWY against REMX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-remx
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). EWY against REMX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-remx
[EWY against REMX (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-remx)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.