RDVY vs SPHB: Differences, Returns & Fees
RDVY and SPHB hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and SPHB returned +37.4% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $25.5bn for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF and $1.0bn for Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF.
SPHB costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.2 points; RDVY is far larger, $25.5bn against $1.0bn.
| RDVY | SPHB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.25% |
| Net assets | $25.5bn | $1.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.2% | +37.4% |
| What it tracks | Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index | S&P 500 High Beta Index |
| Holdings in common | 14% | |
| Holdings dated | Oct 9, 2026 | Oct 10, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 23.2% | 20.4% |
| Below its high | 4.9%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, RDVY and SPHB hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
half
14% in common
On the same fields
RDVY and SPHB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About RDVY
RDVY tracks an index of Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 72 positions, with the top ten at 23.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
About SPHB
SPHB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +37.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, RDVY or SPHB?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RDVY returned +20.2% and SPHB +37.4%.
- Which is cheaper, RDVY or SPHB?
- SPHB is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, RDVY against SPHB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rdvy-vs-sphb
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). RDVY against SPHB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rdvy-vs-sphb
[RDVY against SPHB (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rdvy-vs-sphb)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.