Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MOAT vs RDVY: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MOAT returned +10.3% to RDVY's +17.6%; 11% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MOAT and RDVY

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $11.6bn for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and $25.4bn for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF.

At a glance
+10.3%
MOAT total return, 1 year
+17.6%
RDVY total return, 1 year
0.46%
MOAT expense ratio
0.47%
RDVY expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MOAT costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.3 points; RDVY is 2.2 times larger.

MOAT vs RDVY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMOATRDVY
Return
Total return, 1 year+10.3%+17.6%
Drawdown
Below its high3.7%, high on Aug 27, 20265.3%, high on Aug 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMorningstar Wide Moat Focus IndexNasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.46%0.47%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$11.6bn$25.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common11%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.5%22.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jan 17, 2014 to Oct 23, 2026 · 666 weekly returns · each against VOO
MOAT RDVY
Return
Total return edge RDVY (slight) +356.3% +388.8%
Annualized edge RDVY (slight) +12.6% +13.2%
Price return edge Tie +288.2% +292.1%
Risk
Volatility edge MOAT (slight) 17.6% 19.4%
Max drawdown edge MOAT −30.8% −39.0%
Downside capture 99.8% 104.2%
Beta 0.98 1.09
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MOAT (slight) 0.65 0.63
Sortino edge MOAT (slight) 0.95 0.93
Treynor 0.117 0.113
Calmar edge MOAT 0.41 0.34
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.5% a year −1.0% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.21 −0.44
Information ratio −0.10 0.02
Tracking error 7.7% 8.0%
Reading

RDVY returned slightly more: +388.8% to +356.3%. MOAT swung slightly less: 17.6% to 19.4%. MOAT fell less at its worst: −30.8% to −39.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MOAT vs RDVY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMOATRDVYVOOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+356.3%+388.8%RDVY (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+12.6%+13.2%RDVY (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+288.2%+292.1%TiePrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.6%19.4%MOAT (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.0%13.3%MOAT (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−30.8%−39.0%MOATDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture96.9%106.3%100.0%RDVY (slight)Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.8%104.2%100.0%MOAT (slight)Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.981.091.00MOAT lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.810.831.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.650.63MOAT (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.950.93MOAT (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1170.1130.122MOAT (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.410.34MOATAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOVOOVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.5% a year−1.0% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.21−0.44Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−4.7% to +3.8%−5.4% to +3.4%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.100.02RDVYReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.7%8.0%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 666 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

11%

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and RDVY hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

11% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MOAT RDVY
Microsoft Corp 2.81% 2.22%
Nvidia Corp 2.38% 2.13%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.48% 1.91%
Charles Schwab Corp 2.19% 1.36%
Alphabet Inc 1.18% 1.82%
Applied Materials Inc 1.08% 2.06%
Monolithic Power Systems Inc 1.23% 0.57%
Amphenol Corp 1.26% 0.49%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MOAT
Danaher Corp 2.85%
Estee Lauder Cos Inc 2.78%
Tyler Technologies Inc 2.73%
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc 2.65%
Brown-Forman Corp 2.57%
Kenvue Inc 2.57%
Ge Healthcare Technologies Inc 2.55%
Otis Worldwide Corp 2.53%
Only in RDVY
The Travelers Companies, Inc. 2.42%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 2.32%
Visa Inc. (Class A) 2.26%
Accenture plc 2.19%
The Allstate Corporation 2.17%
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 2.14%
Expedia Group, Inc. 2.13%
Chubb Limited 2.12%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat Tracks an index of Rising Dividend Achievers
Total return, 1 year +10.3% +17.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark −3.4 pts vs VOO +3.9 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.46% 0.47%
Already in the S&P 500 91.6% 94.3%
Holdings 54 72
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $11.6bn $25.4bn

MOAT and RDVY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-4AAA1AD4C1

MOAT and RDVY do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. MOAT follows Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index and RDVY follows Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 11% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MOAT returned +10.3% and RDVY +17.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.3 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MOAT and RDVY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MOAT

MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

RDVY

RDVY tracks an index of Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 72 positions, with the top ten at 22.1%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or RDVY?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +10.3% and RDVY +17.6%.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or RDVY?
MOAT is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MOAT and RDVY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 94% of RDVY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MOAT against RDVY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/moat-vs-rdvy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.