Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

QQQM vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QQQM returned +15.2% to TLT's −7.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QQQM and TLT

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $110.4bn for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF and $47.4bn for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
−7.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio
0.15%
TLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.15% a year; their one-year returns differ by 23.1 points; QQQM is 2.3 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

QQQM vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQQQMTLT
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.2%−7.9%
Drawdown
Below its high4.5%, high on Oct 6, 202642.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksNasdaq-100 IndexICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$110.4bn$47.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight96%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, QQQM and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QQQM TLT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in QQQM
NVIDIA Corp 8.17%
Apple Inc 7.88%
Microsoft Corp 6.14%
Micron Technology Inc 4.50%
Amazon.com Inc 4.25%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93%
Tesla Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 2.93%
Only in TLT
TREASURY BOND 4.32%
TREASURY BOND 4.12%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.02%
TREASURY BOND 3.93%
TREASURY BOND 3.92%
TREASURY BOND 3.89%
TREASURY BOND 3.88%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the Nasdaq-100 Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year +15.2% −7.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +15.2% (QQQ) −7.8% (BBLB)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs QQQ −0.1 pts vs BBLB
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.15%
Holdings 105 47
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $110.4bn $47.4bn

QQQM and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

QQQM and TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQM or TLT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQM returned +15.2% and TLT −7.9%.
Which is cheaper, QQQM or TLT?
Neither: QQQM and TLT both charge 0.15% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QQQM against TLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqqm-vs-tlt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.