Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPYG vs TLT: how they differ
SPYG and TLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SPYG returned more over the year.
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SPYG and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in SPYG | Only in TLT |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 14.85% | TREASURY BOND (2OLD) 4.16% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 10.27% | TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.05% |
| APPLE INC 6.73% | TREASURY BOND (OTR) 1.03% |
| ALPHABET INC CL A 5.47% | TREASURY BOND 0.02% |
| BROADCOM INC 4.80% | |
| ALPHABET INC CL C 4.38% | |
| META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 3.97% | |
| AMAZON.COM INC 3.67% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| SPYG State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF | TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | iShares |
| What it is | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth | 20+ year Treasuries |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.9% | −6.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.4 pts | −23.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.15% |
| Holdings | 150 | 41 |
SPYG in plain words
SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 59.8%.
TLT in plain words
TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPYG or TLT?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYG returned +17.9% and TLT returned −6.4%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SPYG or TLT?
- SPYG charges 0.04% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYG against TLT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spyg-vs-tlt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources