Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
SCHG vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SCHG returned +6.8% to TLT's −7.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about SCHG and TLT
Net assets: $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF, and $47.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHG costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.7 points.
| Measure | SCHG | TLT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +6.8% | −7.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index | ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 and TLT as of Oct 27, 2026 | $63.0bn | $47.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 95% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 51.0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
SCHG and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
TLT
TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or TLT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +6.8% and TLT −7.9%.
- Which is cheaper, SCHG or TLT?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SCHG against TLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-tlt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). SCHG against TLT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-tlt
[SCHG against TLT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-tlt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.