Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
QQQI vs VYM: how they differ
Over the year VYM returned more, +17.6% against +16.9%, and VYM charges 0.04% against 0.68%.
NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QQQI and VYM hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | QQQI | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc | 2.82% | 8.07% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 1.97% | 1.52% |
| Texas Instruments Inc | 1.19% | 1.07% |
| Analog Devices Inc | 0.85% | 0.82% |
| PepsiCo Inc | 0.81% | 0.91% |
| QUALCOMM Inc | 0.84% | 0.80% |
| Amgen Inc | 0.85% | 0.72% |
| Gilead Sciences Inc | 0.69% | 0.68% |
| Starbucks Corp | 0.51% | 0.50% |
| T-Mobile US Inc | 0.78% | 0.39% |
| Comcast Corp | 0.39% | 0.41% |
| Automatic Data Processing Inc | 0.40% | 0.36% |
| Only in QQQI | Only in VYM |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 7.66% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36% |
| Apple Inc 6.63% | Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73% |
| Micron Technology Inc 5.61% | Johnson & Johnson 2.31% |
| Microsoft Corp 4.38% | Caterpillar Inc 1.73% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.12% | AbbVie Inc 1.57% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.05% | Chevron Corp 1.51% |
| Tesla Inc 3.35% | Bank of America Corp 1.45% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.32% | Procter & Gamble Co/The 1.45% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF | VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Income ETF | Core index fund |
| Issuer | NEOS | Vanguard |
| What it is | covered call, vs QQQ | US high dividend |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.9% | +17.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +23.0% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −6.1 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.2% | not an income fund |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | not filed | 608 |
QQQI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QQQI paid 14.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.1 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.3%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
VYM in plain words
VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, QQQI or VYM?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQI returned +16.9% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, QQQI or VYM?
- QQQI charges 0.68% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- Are QQQI and VYM the same kind of fund?
- No. QQQI is an option-income ETF and VYM is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQI against VYM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqqi-vs-vym Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources