Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
QDTE vs VYM: how they differ
Over the year QDTE returned more, +22.3% against +17.6%, and VYM charges 0.04% against 0.96%.
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and VYM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QDTE | Only in VYM |
|---|---|
| NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 26.01% | Broadcom Inc 8.07% |
| 4NDX US 12/18/26 C2450.1 FLX 25.19% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36% |
| NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.18% | Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73% |
| 4NDX US 09/18/26 C2250 FLX 18.27% | Johnson & Johnson 2.31% |
| Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 5.05% | Caterpillar Inc 1.73% |
| First American Government Obligations Fu 3.30% | AbbVie Inc 1.57% |
| Cisco Systems Inc 1.52% | |
| Chevron Corp 1.51% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
| QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Income ETF | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Roundhill | Vanguard |
| What it is | 0DTE covered call, vs QQQ | US high dividend |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.3% | +17.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +23.0% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.7 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 36.8% | not an income fund |
| Expense ratio | 0.96% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | not filed | 608 |
QDTE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QDTE paid 36.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 18.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.3%, paid weekly.
VYM in plain words
VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, QDTE or VYM?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QDTE returned +22.3% and VYM returned +17.6%, so QDTE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, QDTE or VYM?
- QDTE charges 0.96% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- Are QDTE and VYM the same kind of fund?
- No. QDTE is an option-income ETF and VYM is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTE against VYM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qdte-vs-vym Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources