Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
QDTE vs VYM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QDTE returned +16.5% to VYM's +18.0%, and VYM charges 0.04% to QDTE's 0.96%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about QDTE and VYM
Net assets: $919m on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, and $78.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF.
Pair scorecard
VYM costs 0.92 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.5 points.
| Measure | QDTE | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +16.5% | +18.0% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 21.6% | rose 15.2% |
| Latest payout, annualized | 20.7% | |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Oct 23, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Benchmark: Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ | FTSE High Dividend Yield Index |
| Against its benchmark, same days | ahead by 1.3 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.96% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, QDTE as of Oct 28, 2026 and VYM as of Sep 30, 2026 | $919m | $78.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 90% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 26.2% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Mar 15, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 136 weekly returnsQDTE returned more: +60.8% to +47.6%. VYM swung less: 12.2% to 17.8%. VYM fell less at its worst: −12.1% to −20.5%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | QDTE | VYM | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +60.8% | +47.6% | QDTE | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +19.9% | +16.0% | QDTE | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −38.8% | +38.1% | VYM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 17.8% | 12.2% | VYM | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.2% | 8.4% | VYM | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −20.5% | −12.1% | VYM | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.87 | 0.93 | VYM (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.27 | 1.34 | VYM (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.97 | 1.32 | VYM | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 136 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and VYM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
QDTE and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price.
QDTE and VYM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. QDTE is measured against Nasdaq-100 through QQQ and VYM follows FTSE High Dividend Yield Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 28, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- Cost. QDTE charges 0.96% of assets a year and VYM 0.04%, a gap of 0.92 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
QDTE
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QDTE paid 34.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.3 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.7%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 23, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
VYM
VYM tracks an index of US high dividend. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 595 positions, with the top ten at 26.2%.
Questions people ask
- Are QDTE and VYM in the same category?
- QDTE is an option-income ETF and VYM is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, QDTE or VYM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QDTE returned +16.5% and VYM +18.0%.
- Which is cheaper, QDTE or VYM?
- VYM is cheaper, by 0.92 percentage points a year. That is about $92 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, QDTE against VYM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qdte-vs-vym
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). QDTE against VYM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qdte-vs-vym
[QDTE against VYM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qdte-vs-vym)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.