Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
QDTE vs QQQ: how they differ
Over the year QQQ returned more, +23.0% against +22.3%, and QQQ charges 0.18% against 0.96%.
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and QQQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QDTE | Only in QQQ |
|---|---|
| NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 26.01% | NVIDIA Corp 8.52% |
| 4NDX US 12/18/26 C2450.1 FLX 25.19% | Apple Inc 7.72% |
| NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.18% | Microsoft Corp 5.89% |
| 4NDX US 09/18/26 C2250 FLX 18.27% | Micron Technology Inc 4.90% |
| Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 5.05% | Amazon.com Inc 4.36% |
| First American Government Obligations Fu 3.30% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.65% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.12% | |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.07% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
| QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Income ETF | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Roundhill | Invesco |
| What it is | 0DTE covered call, vs QQQ | Nasdaq-100 |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.3% | +23.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +23.0% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.7 pts | +5.5 pts |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 36.8% | not an income fund |
| Expense ratio | 0.96% | 0.18% |
| Holdings | not filed | 105 |
QDTE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QDTE paid 36.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 18.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.3%, paid weekly.
QQQ in plain words
QQQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 47.0%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, QDTE or QQQ?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QDTE returned +22.3% and QQQ returned +23.0%, so QQQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, QDTE or QQQ?
- QDTE charges 0.96% a year and QQQ charges 0.18%, so QQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- Are QDTE and QQQ the same kind of fund?
- No. QDTE is an option-income ETF and QQQ is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTE against QQQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qdte-vs-qqq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources