Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

QCJL vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QCJL returned +10.0% to QQQM's +15.2%, and QQQM charges 0.15% to QCJL's 0.90%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QCJL and QQQM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $105m for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July and $110.4bn for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

At a glance
+10.0%
QCJL total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
0.90%
QCJL expense ratio
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQM costs 0.75 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.2 points; QQQM is far larger, $110.4bn against $105m.

QCJL vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQCJLQQQM
Return
Total return, 1 year+10.0%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Index fall to the buffer4.2%
Fund price fall to the buffer4.2%
Benchmark
What it tracksQQQNasdaq-100 Index
The outcome period
Room to the cap11.7%
Buffer left, in index points20.0% of 20.0%
Days left in the period261
Period endsJul 16, 2027
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.90%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$105m$110.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight96%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund46.7%

Method

Side by side

QCJL FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits Buffer ETF Stock ETF
What it is Defined outcome, 20% on QQQ Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +10.0% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.6% (QQQ) +15.2% (QQQ)
Gap to its benchmark −4.6 pts vs QQQ 0.0 pts vs QQQ
Expense ratio 0.90% 0.15%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 105
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $105m $110.4bn

QCJL and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

QCJL and QQQM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QCJL

From its price on Oct 28, 2026, the fund can gain about 11.7% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 4.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, QQQ can fall 4.2% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 20.0% of the 20.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 261 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Jul 16, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are QCJL and QQQM in the same category?
QCJL is a buffer ETF and QQQM is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, QCJL or QQQM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QCJL returned +10.0% and QQQM +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, QCJL or QQQM?
QQQM is cheaper, by 0.75 percentage points a year. That is about $75 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QCJL against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qcjl-vs-qqqm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.