Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

NSEP vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, NSEP returned +10.3% to QQQM's +15.2%, and QQQM charges 0.15% to NSEP's 0.79%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about NSEP and QQQM

Net assets: $114m on Oct 28, 2026 for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - Sep, and $110.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

At a glance
+10.3%
NSEP total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
0.79%
NSEP expense ratio
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQM costs 0.64 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.9 points; QQQM is far larger, $110.4bn against $107m.

NSEP vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureNSEPQQQM
Return
Total return, 1 year+10.3%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Index fall to the buffer1.1%
Fund price fall to the buffer1.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksQQQNasdaq-100 Index
The outcome period
Room to the cap16.8%
Buffer left, in index points15.0% of 15.0%
Days left in the period307
Period endsAug 31, 2027
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$107m$110.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight96%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund46.7%

Method

Risk and return

Sep 13, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 110 weekly returns · each against QQQ
NSEP QQQM
Return
Total return edge QQQM +28.2% +50.1%
Annualized edge QQQM +12.5% +21.1%
Price return edge QQQM +28.2% +48.3%
Risk
Volatility edge NSEP 8.8% 19.7%
Max drawdown edge NSEP −11.0% −21.2%
Downside capture 48.5% 99.8%
Beta 0.42 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge NSEP (slight) 0.91 0.87
Sortino edge NSEP (slight) 1.40 1.34
Treynor 0.194 0.172
Calmar edge NSEP 1.13 1.00
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.0% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.45 0.75
Information ratio −0.75 0.14
Tracking error 12.0% 0.3%
Reading

QQQM returned more: +50.1% to +28.2%. NSEP swung less: 8.8% to 19.7%. NSEP fell less at its worst: −11.0% to −21.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: NSEP vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureNSEPQQQMQQQEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+28.2%+50.1%QQQMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+12.5%+21.1%QQQMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+28.2%+48.3%QQQMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility8.8%19.7%NSEPSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation5.8%12.7%NSEPLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−11.0%−21.2%NSEPDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture30.6%99.8%100.0%QQQMShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture48.5%99.8%100.0%NSEPShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.420.991.00NSEP lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.871.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.910.87NSEP (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.401.34NSEP (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1940.1720.170NSEPReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar1.131.00NSEPAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkQQQQQQQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.0% a year+0.1% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.450.75Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.4% to +5.4%−0.2% to +0.4%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.750.14QQQMReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error12.0%0.3%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 110 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

Side by side

NSEP Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - Sep QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits Buffer ETF Stock ETF
What it is Defined outcome, 15% on QQQ Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +10.3% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.6% (QQQ) +15.2% (QQQ)
Gap to its benchmark −4.3 pts vs QQQ 0.0 pts vs QQQ
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.15%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 105
Net assets, NSEP as of Oct 28, 2026 and QQQM as of Oct 27, 2026 $114m $110.4bn

NSEP and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-A439DF9F8C

NSEP and QQQM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. NSEP follows QQQ and QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 NSEP returned +10.3% and QQQM +15.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.9 points.
  3. Cost. NSEP charges 0.79% of assets a year and QQQM 0.15%, a gap of 0.64 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

NSEP and QQQM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
NSEP

From its price on Oct 28, 2026, the fund can gain about 16.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.5% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, QQQ can fall 1.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 307 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Aug 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are NSEP and QQQM in the same category?
NSEP is a buffer ETF and QQQM is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, NSEP or QQQM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NSEP returned +10.3% and QQQM +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, NSEP or QQQM?
QQQM is cheaper, by 0.64 percentage points a year. That is about $64 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, NSEP against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nsep-vs-qqqm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.