PTNQ vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
PTNQ and SCHG hold 59% of their weight in the same names. Net assets: $1.3bn on Oct 2, 2026 for Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF, and $61.1bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
SCHG costs 0.61 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points.
| PTNQ | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, PTNQ as of Oct 2, 2026 and SCHG as of May 31, 2026 | $1.3bn | $61.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.3% | +10.4% |
| What it tracks | Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| Holdings in common | 59% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 46.4% | 57.2% |
| Below its high | 5.6%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 3.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
PTNQ and SCHG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. PTNQ follows Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
- Cost. PTNQ charges 0.65% of assets a year and SCHG 0.04%, a gap of 0.61 points.
- Size. PTNQ has $1.3bn in net assets and SCHG $61.1bn (net assets, PTNQ as of Oct 2, 2026 and SCHG as of May 31, 2026); SCHG is 47.0 times larger.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PTNQ and SCHG hold 59% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
59% in common
On the same fields
PTNQ and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About PTNQ
PTNQ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested, against +15.9% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 46.4%. It sat 5.6% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +10.4% with distributions reinvested, against +15.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PTNQ or SCHG?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PTNQ returned +10.3% and SCHG +10.4%.
- Which is cheaper, PTNQ or SCHG?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.61 percentage points a year. That is about $61 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PTNQ against SCHG, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ptnq-vs-schg
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). PTNQ against SCHG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ptnq-vs-schg
[PTNQ against SCHG (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ptnq-vs-schg)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.