Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PDBC vs XOVR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to XOVR's −3.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PDBC and XOVR
Net assets: $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF, and $2.2bn on Jun 30, 2026 for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.
Pair scorecard
PDBC costs 1.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 58.6 points.
| Measure | PDBC | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +55.6% | −3.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 6.5%, high on Oct 5, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 1.81% |
| Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and XOVR as of Jun 30, 2026 | $8.0bn | $2.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 43% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 63.1% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and XOVR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PDBC and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PDBC
PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.
XOVR
XOVR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.81% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or XOVR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and XOVR −3.0%.
- Which is cheaper, PDBC or XOVR?
- PDBC is cheaper, by 1.22 percentage points a year. That is about $122 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PDBC against XOVR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-xovr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PDBC against XOVR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-xovr
[PDBC against XOVR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-xovr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.