Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MAGS vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MAGS returned +5.8% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MAGS and PDBC

Net assets: $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF, and $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

At a glance
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MAGS costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 49.8 points; PDBC is 1.5 times larger.

MAGS vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMAGSPDBC
Return
Total return, 1 year+5.8%+55.6%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.30%0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.5bn$8.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight22%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 21, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 183 weekly returns
MAGS PDBC
Return
Total return edge MAGS +189.1% +61.0%
Annualized edge MAGS +35.2% +14.5%
Price return edge MAGS +181.4% +42.4%
Risk
Volatility edge PDBC 24.0% 16.3%
Max drawdown edge PDBC −26.6% −14.7%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MAGS 1.19 0.63
Sortino edge MAGS 1.97 1.00
Calmar edge MAGS 1.33 0.98
Reading

MAGS returned more: +189.1% to +61.0%. PDBC swung less: 16.3% to 24.0%. PDBC fell less at its worst: −14.7% to −26.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MAGS vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMAGSPDBCEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+189.1%+61.0%MAGSPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+35.2%+14.5%MAGSTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+181.4%+42.4%MAGSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility24.0%16.3%PDBCSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.5%10.3%PDBCLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−26.6%−14.7%PDBCDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe1.190.63MAGSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.971.00MAGSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar1.330.98MAGSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 183 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MAGS PDBC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +5.8% +55.6%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +54.6% (DBC)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +1.0 pts vs DBC
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.59%
Holdings 8 1
Net assets, MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 and PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.5bn $8.0bn

MAGS and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

MAGS and PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or PDBC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +5.8% and PDBC +55.6%.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or PDBC?
MAGS is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MAGS against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-pdbc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.