Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and PDBC

Net assets: $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, and $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FBCG costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 46.1 points.

FBCG vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGPDBC
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%+55.6%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.59%
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026$7.6bn$8.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight85%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBCG PDBC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FBCG
NVIDIA CORP 14.90%
APPLE INC 9.31%
ALPHABET INC 9.27%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94%
BROADCOM INC 4.38%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31%
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +9.5% +55.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +54.6% (DBC)
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO +1.0 pts vs DBC
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.59%
Holdings 230 1
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.6bn $8.0bn

FBCG and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or PDBC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and PDBC +55.6%.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or PDBC?
FBCG is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-pdbc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.