Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PABU vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PABU returned +8.2% to SPMO's +18.4%; 21% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PABU and SPMO

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $2.5bn for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF and $22.3bn for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

At a glance
+8.2%
PABU total return, 1 year
+18.4%
SPMO total return, 1 year
0.10%
PABU expense ratio
0.13%
SPMO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

PABU costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.2 points; SPMO is 8.9 times larger.

PABU vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePABUSPMO
Return
Total return, 1 year+8.2%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high10.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select IndexS&P 500 Momentum Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.10%0.13%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$2.5bn$22.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common21%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund49.1%50.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 29, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 234 weekly returns
PABU SPMO
Return
Total return edge SPMO +81.9% +161.3%
Annualized edge SPMO +14.2% +23.8%
Price return edge SPMO +73.3% +147.9%
Risk
Volatility edge PABU 17.7% 20.1%
Max drawdown edge PABU (slight) −19.0% −20.0%
Downside capture 107.3% 93.8%
Beta 1.07 0.98
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SPMO 0.60 0.95
Sortino edge SPMO 0.91 1.49
Treynor 0.099 0.164
Calmar edge SPMO 0.75 1.19
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.2% a year +3.8% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.42 1.28
Information ratio −0.41 0.36
Tracking error 3.5% 9.7%

Each against its own benchmark: PABU against PBUS, Apr 29, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; SPMO against VOO, Oct 23, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SPMO returned more: +161.3% to +81.9%. PABU swung less: 17.7% to 20.1%. PABU fell slightly less at its worst: −19.0% to −20.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: PABU vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePABUSPMOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+81.9%+161.3%SPMOPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.2%+23.8%SPMOTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+73.3%+147.9%SPMOPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.7%20.1%PABUSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.6%12.8%PABU (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−19.0%−20.0%PABU (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture108.8%98.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture107.3%93.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.070.98Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.960.74Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.600.95SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.911.49SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0990.164Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.751.19SPMOAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkPBUSVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.2% a year+3.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.421.28Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−5.4% to +0.9%−2.0% to +9.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.410.36Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.5%9.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 234 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

21%

By the books each fund has filed, PABU and SPMO hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

21% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PABU SPMO
APPLE 7.66% 9.95%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.88% 5.48%
ALPHABET CLASS C 3.54% 3.82%
ALPHABET CLASS A 1.60% 4.76%
ANALOG DEVICES 1.02% 1.04%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY 2.89% 1.02%
PROLOGIS REIT 1.83% 0.59%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 0.44% 1.86%
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP REIT INC 2.04% 0.41%
KLA 0.38% 1.00%
AFLAC 0.53% 0.27%
EDISON INTERNATIONAL 0.66% 0.12%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PABU
NVIDIA 9.30%
MICROSOFT 7.93%
TESLA INC 3.58%
ELI LILLY 3.53%
BROADCOM INC 3.31%
SNOWFLAKE 3.28%
SERVICENOW 3.08%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CO 2.45%
Only in SPMO
Micron Technology Inc 8.80%
Johnson & Johnson 4.86%
Intel Corp 4.60%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 3.57%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.53%
Lam Research Corp 2.33%
Applied Materials Inc 2.28%
Merck & Co Inc 2.22%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PABU iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the S&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year +8.2% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (PBUS) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark −5.1 pts vs PBUS +4.7 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.10% 0.13%
Already in the S&P 500 93.1% 100.0%
Holdings 88 101
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $2.5bn $22.3bn

PABU and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-5FA6449783

PABU and SPMO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. PABU follows MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index and SPMO follows S&P 500 Momentum Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 21% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 PABU returned +8.2% and SPMO +18.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

PABU and SPMO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PABU

PABU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +8.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 88 positions, with the top ten at 49.1%.

SPMO

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 50.7%. It sat 10.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PABU or SPMO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PABU returned +8.2% and SPMO +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, PABU or SPMO?
PABU is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do PABU and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 93% of PABU and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PABU against SPMO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pabu-vs-spmo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.