ONEQ vs QGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees
ONEQ and QGRW hold 55% of their weight in the same names. Net assets: $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF, and $2.7bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund.
ONEQ costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.5 points.
| ONEQ | QGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.21% | 0.28% |
| Net assets, ONEQ as of Sep 30, 2026 and QGRW as of Jun 30, 2026 | $10.9bn | $2.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.3% | +16.8% |
| What it tracks | Nasdaq Composite Index | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 55% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.6% | 54.1% |
| Below its high | 4.3%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 4.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
ONEQ and QGRW are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. ONEQ follows Nasdaq Composite Index and QGRW follows WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index.
- Number of holdings. ONEQ holds 1,021 positions and QGRW holds 100.
- Size. ONEQ has $10.9bn in net assets and QGRW $2.7bn (net assets, ONEQ as of Sep 30, 2026 and QGRW as of Jun 30, 2026); ONEQ is 4.0 times larger.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and QGRW hold 55% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
55% in common
On the same fields
ONEQ and QGRW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About ONEQ
ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,021 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About QGRW
QGRW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +15.9% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 54.1%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or QGRW?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +16.3% and QGRW +16.8%.
- Which is cheaper, ONEQ or QGRW?
- ONEQ is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ONEQ against QGRW, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oneq-vs-qgrw
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). ONEQ against QGRW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oneq-vs-qgrw
[ONEQ against QGRW (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oneq-vs-qgrw)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.