ONEQ vs PWB: Differences, Returns & Fees
ONEQ and PWB hold 33% of their weight in the same names, and PWB returned +20.2% over the year. Net assets: $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF, and $2.6bn on Oct 20, 2026 for Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF.
ONEQ costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.9 points.
| ONEQ | PWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.21% | 0.55% |
| Net assets, ONEQ as of Sep 30, 2026 and PWB as of Oct 20, 2026 | $10.9bn | $2.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.3% | +20.2% |
| What it tracks | Nasdaq Composite Index | Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index |
| Holdings in common | 33% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.6% | 36.0% |
| Below its high | 4.3%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 8.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and PWB hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
33% in common
On the same fields
ONEQ and PWB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About ONEQ
ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,021 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About PWB
PWB tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or PWB?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +16.3% and PWB +20.2%.
- Which is cheaper, ONEQ or PWB?
- ONEQ is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. That is about $34 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ONEQ against PWB, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oneq-vs-pwb
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). ONEQ against PWB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oneq-vs-pwb
[ONEQ against PWB (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oneq-vs-pwb)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.