Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MUB vs SCHP: how they differ

MUB and SCHP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MUB returned more over the year.

iShares National Muni Bond ETF and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and SCHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MUBOnly in SCHP
HOUSTON TEX HIGHER ED FIN CORP 0.13%United States Treasury 4.09%
DISTRICT COLUMBIA UNIV REV 0.10%United States Treasury 4.03%
ECTOR CNTY TEX 0.08%United States Treasury 4.02%
NEW ORLEANS LA 0.08%United States Treasury 3.79%
PORT TACOMA WASH REV 0.08%United States Treasury 3.62%
CONTRA COSTA CALIF CMNTY COLLE 0.06%United States Treasury 3.42%
LOS ANGELES CALIF 0.06%United States Treasury 3.39%
LOS ANGELES CNTY CALIF 0.06%United States Treasury 3.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

MUB and SCHP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MUB
iShares National Muni Bond ETF
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesSchwab
What it isNational Muni BondUS TIPS
Total return, 1 year+0.1%−0.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−17.4 pts−18.4 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.03%
Holdings521548

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCHP in plain words

SCHP is a bond fund tracking the US TIPS. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or SCHP?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and SCHP returned −0.8%, so MUB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MUB or SCHP?
MUB charges 0.05% a year and SCHP charges 0.03%, so SCHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MUB against SCHP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MUB against SCHP, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mub-vs-schp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources