Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BINC vs MUB: how they differ
BINC and MUB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and BINC returned more over the year.
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF and iShares National Muni Bond ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BINC and MUB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BINC | Only in MUB |
|---|---|
| UMBS, TBA 5.13% | HOUSTON TEX HIGHER ED FIN CORP 0.13% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.81% | DISTRICT COLUMBIA UNIV REV 0.10% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.14% | ECTOR CNTY TEX 0.08% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.10% | NEW ORLEANS LA 0.08% |
| UMBS, TBA 1.52% | PORT TACOMA WASH REV 0.08% |
| iShares iBoxx USD High Yield Corporate B 1.02% | CONTRA COSTA CALIF CMNTY COLLE 0.06% |
| iShares iBoxx USD Investment Grade Corpo 0.64% | LOS ANGELES CALIF 0.06% |
| UMBS, TBA 0.53% | LOS ANGELES CNTY CALIF 0.06% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Flexible Income | National Muni Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.0% | +0.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −15.5 pts | −17.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.05% |
| Holdings | 4124 | 5215 |
BINC in plain words
BINC is an index equity fund tracking the Flexible Income. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4124 positions, with the top ten at 17.4%.
MUB in plain words
MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BINC or MUB?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +2.0% and MUB returned +0.1%, so BINC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BINC against MUB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-mub Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources