Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
MTUM vs XLSR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MTUM returned +10.2% to XLSR's +9.5%; 5% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MTUM and XLSRNet assets: $17.0bn on Nov 4, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF, and $1.1bn on Nov 3, 2026 for State Street US Sector Rotation ETF.
Pair scorecard
MTUM costs 0.55 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points; MTUM is 15.8 times larger.
| Measure | MTUM | XLSR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +10.2% | +9.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 20.8%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.70% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $17.4bn | $1.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 5% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.9% | 90.9% |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and XLSR hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.
half
5% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
MTUM and XLSR on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
MTUM
MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +10.2% with distributions reinvested, against +14.5% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 33.9%. It sat 20.8% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.
XLSR
XLSR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.70% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 34% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 21 positions, with the top ten at 90.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or XLSR?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +10.2% and XLSR +9.5%.
- Which is cheaper, MTUM or XLSR?
- MTUM is cheaper, by 0.55 percentage points a year. That is about $55 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MTUM against XLSR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-xlsr
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). MTUM against XLSR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-xlsr
[MTUM against XLSR (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-xlsr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.