Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MTUM vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MTUM returned +18.4% to VONG's +1.1%; 28% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MTUM and VONG

Net assets: $18.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF, and $47.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
+1.1%
VONG total return, 1 year
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio
0.06%
VONG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VONG costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.3 points; VONG is 2.3 times larger.

MTUM vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMVONG
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.4%+1.1%
Drawdown
Below its high11.9%, high on Jun 22, 20264.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant IndexRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.06%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$20.4bn$47.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common28%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.5%57.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 704 weekly returns
MTUM VONG
Return
Total return edge VONG +554.7% +664.8%
Annualized edge VONG (slight) +14.9% +16.2%
Price return edge VONG +459.1% +565.6%
Risk
Volatility edge VONG (slight) 19.0% 18.1%
Max drawdown edge Tie −31.9% −32.5%
Downside capture 101.7% 99.8%
Beta 1.02 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VONG 0.73 0.82
Sortino edge VONG 1.07 1.21
Treynor 0.135 0.151
Calmar edge VONG (slight) 0.47 0.50
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.3% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.53 0.76
Information ratio 0.17 0.11
Tracking error 9.3% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: MTUM against MLRG, Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; VONG against IWF, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VONG returned more: +664.8% to +554.7%. VONG swung slightly less: 18.1% to 19.0%. MTUM and VONG fell about the same at their worst: −31.9% and −32.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MTUM vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMVONGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+554.7%+664.8%VONGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.9%+16.2%VONG (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+459.1%+565.6%VONGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.0%18.1%VONG (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.0%12.2%VONG (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.9%−32.5%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture106.2%99.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture101.7%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.020.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.761.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.730.82VONGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.071.21VONGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1350.151Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.470.50VONG (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkMLRGIWFThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.3% a year+0.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.530.76Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.7% to +6.3%−0.3% to +0.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.170.11Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.3%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 704 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

28%

By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and VONG hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

28% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MTUM VONG
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.00% 3.52%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 6.06% 2.92%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.62% 5.88%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.07% 4.75%
LAM RESEARCH 1.89% 1.21%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.53% 1.19%
CATERPILLAR INC 1.92% 1.08%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 2.88% 0.94%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 1.83% 0.78%
GE VERNOVA 1.46% 0.75%
KLA 1.04% 0.75%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT 1.43% 0.75%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MTUM
INTEL CORPORATION 3.92%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.64%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.45%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.96%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP 2.22%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 1.84%
MERCK & CO INC 1.81%
CHEVRON 1.65%
Only in VONG
NVIDIA Corp 15.63%
Apple Inc 7.65%
Microsoft Corp 5.59%
Broadcom Inc 4.79%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.83%
Tesla Inc 3.04%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.71%
Visa Inc 1.69%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor Tracks the Russell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year +18.4% +1.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (MLRG) +0.9% (IWF)
Gap to its benchmark +4.8 pts vs MLRG +0.2 pts vs IWF
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 93.2% 95.5%
Holdings 126 373
Net assets, MTUM as of Oct 27, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026 $18.7bn $47.1bn

MTUM and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-4DB59B213F

MTUM and VONG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. MTUM follows MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index and VONG follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 28% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MTUM returned +18.4% and VONG +1.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 17.3 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MTUM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VONG

VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or VONG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +18.4% and VONG +1.1%.
Which is cheaper, MTUM or VONG?
VONG is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MTUM and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 93% of MTUM and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MTUM against VONG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-vong

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.