Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MTUM vs SPYG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MTUM returned +18.4% to SPYG's +12.2%; 25% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MTUM and SPYG

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $18.7bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and $55.9bn for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
+12.2%
SPYG total return, 1 year
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio
0.04%
SPYG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPYG costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.2 points; SPYG is 3.0 times larger.

MTUM vs SPYG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMSPYG
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.4%+12.2%
Drawdown
Below its high11.9%, high on Jun 22, 20264.1%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant IndexS&P 500 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.04%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$18.7bn$55.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common25%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.5%59.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 704 weekly returns
MTUM SPYG
Return
Total return edge SPYG +554.7% +667.3%
Annualized edge SPYG (slight) +14.9% +16.2%
Price return edge SPYG +459.1% +554.3%
Risk
Volatility edge SPYG (slight) 19.0% 17.8%
Max drawdown edge Tie −31.9% −31.9%
Downside capture 101.7% 103.2%
Beta 1.02 1.05
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SPYG 0.73 0.83
Sortino edge SPYG 1.07 1.23
Treynor 0.135 0.074
Calmar edge SPYG (slight) 0.47 0.51
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.3% a year −1.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.53 −1.00
Information ratio 0.17 −0.11
Tracking error 9.3% 5.6%

Each against its own benchmark: MTUM against MLRG, Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; SPYG against IVW, Oct 13, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SPYG returned more: +667.3% to +554.7%. SPYG swung slightly less: 17.8% to 19.0%. MTUM and SPYG fell about the same at their worst: −31.9% and −31.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MTUM vs SPYG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMSPYGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+554.7%+667.3%SPYGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.9%+16.2%SPYG (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+459.1%+554.3%SPYGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.0%17.8%SPYG (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.0%12.0%SPYG (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.9%−31.9%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture106.2%104.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture101.7%103.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.021.05Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.760.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.730.83SPYGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.071.23SPYGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1350.074Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.470.51SPYG (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkMLRGIVWThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.3% a year−1.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.53−1.00Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.7% to +6.3%−3.2% to +1.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.17−0.11Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.3%5.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 704 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

25%

By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and SPYG hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

25% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MTUM SPYG
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.00% 2.90%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.62% 5.21%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 6.06% 2.53%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.07% 4.17%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.45% 1.06%
CATERPILLAR INC 1.92% 0.91%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.53% 0.87%
LAM RESEARCH 1.89% 0.83%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 1.83% 0.76%
GE VERNOVA 1.46% 0.66%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.64% 0.64%
KLA 1.04% 0.56%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MTUM
INTEL CORPORATION 3.92%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.96%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP 2.22%
DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC CLASS C 1.89%
MERCK & CO INC 1.81%
CHEVRON 1.65%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 1.64%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT 1.43%
Only in SPYG
NVIDIA CORP 14.61%
MICROSOFT CORP 10.93%
APPLE INC 7.01%
BROADCOM INC 4.51%
META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 3.79%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.65%
ELI LILLY + CO 2.84%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B 2.80%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor Tracks the S&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year +18.4% +12.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (MLRG) +12.1% (IVW)
Gap to its benchmark +4.8 pts vs MLRG +0.1 pts vs IVW
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 93.2% 100.0%
Holdings 126 152
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $18.7bn $55.9bn

MTUM and SPYG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-152AB2CA16

MTUM and SPYG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. MTUM follows MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index and SPYG follows S&P 500 Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 25% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MTUM returned +18.4% and SPYG +12.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 6.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MTUM and SPYG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SPYG

SPYG tracks the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +12.1% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 152 positions, with the top ten at 59.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or SPYG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +18.4% and SPYG +12.2%.
Which is cheaper, MTUM or SPYG?
SPYG is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MTUM and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 93% of MTUM and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MTUM against SPYG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-spyg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.