Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPMO vs SPYG: how they differ
SPMO and SPYG hold 44% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SPMO and SPYG hold 44% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SPMO | SPYG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 8.93% | 14.85% |
| Broadcom Inc | 6.24% | 4.80% |
| Alphabet Inc | 4.29% | 5.47% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.42% | 4.38% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 11.01% | 3.09% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.12% | 2.31% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 1.50% | 1.07% |
| Johnson & Johnson | 4.64% | 1.06% |
| Lam Research Corp | 3.38% | 1.05% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 2.44% | 1.04% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.82% | 1.01% |
| RTX Corp | 1.57% | 0.75% |
| Only in SPMO | Only in SPYG |
|---|---|
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 3.22% | MICROSOFT CORP 10.27% |
| Intel Corp 2.63% | APPLE INC 6.73% |
| Western Digital Corp 1.56% | META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 3.97% |
| Citigroup Inc 1.09% | AMAZON.COM INC 3.67% |
| Analog Devices Inc 0.73% | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B 2.61% |
| Charles Schwab Corp/The 0.69% | ELI LILLY + CO 2.49% |
| McKesson Corp 0.56% | JPMORGAN CHASE + CO 1.81% |
| Lockheed Martin Corp 0.51% | TESLA INC 1.78% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | SPYG State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Invesco | State Street |
| What it is | S&P 500 Momentum | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +24.5% | +17.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +7.0 pts | +0.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.13% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 101 | 150 |
SPMO in plain words
SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 51.9%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPYG in plain words
SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 59.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPMO or SPYG?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPMO returned +24.5% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SPMO or SPYG?
- SPMO charges 0.13% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SPMO and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPMO and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 44% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPMO against SPYG, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spmo-vs-spyg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources