Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPYG vs XLG: how they differ

SPYG and XLG hold 74% of their weight in the same names, and SPYG returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPYG and XLG hold 74% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPYG and XLG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPYGXLG
NVIDIA CORP14.85%12.79%
MICROSOFT CORP10.27%8.83%
APPLE INC6.73%11.58%
ALPHABET INC CL A5.47%4.71%
BROADCOM INC4.80%4.12%
ALPHABET INC CL C4.38%3.77%
AMAZON.COM INC3.67%5.95%
META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A3.97%3.42%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC3.09%2.66%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B2.61%2.25%
ELI LILLY + CO2.49%2.15%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES2.31%1.99%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPYGOnly in XLG
RTX CORP 0.75%ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 1.65%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC A 0.60%Intel Corp 1.20%
AMPHENOL CORP CL A 0.55%Walmart Inc 1.12%
ARISTA NETWORKS INC 0.55%Bank of America Corp 0.99%
WELLTOWER INC 0.47%Costco Wholesale Corp 0.97%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC 0.43%Chevron Corp 0.96%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC 0.41%Merck & Co Inc 0.86%
AMGEN INC 0.39%UnitedHealth Group Inc 0.85%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

SPYG and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPYG
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetInvesco
What it isSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 GrowthS&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year+17.9%+12.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.4 pts−5.3 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.20%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%100.0%
Holdings15052

SPYG in plain words

SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 59.8%.

XLG in plain words

XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPYG or XLG?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYG returned +17.9% and XLG returned +12.2%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPYG or XLG?
SPYG charges 0.04% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPYG and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYG and 100% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 74% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPYG against XLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYG against XLG, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spyg-vs-xlg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources