Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MTUM vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MTUM returned +18.4% to QQQ's +15.2%; 32% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MTUM and QQQ

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $18.7bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and $483.0bn for Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1.

At a glance
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQ total return, 1 year
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio
0.18%
QQQ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MTUM costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.2 points; QQQ is far larger, $483.0bn against $18.7bn.

MTUM vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMQQQ
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.4%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high11.9%, high on Jun 22, 20264.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant IndexNasdaq-100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.18%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$18.7bn$483.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common32%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.5%46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 704 weekly returns
MTUM QQQ
Return
Total return edge QQQ +554.7% +1,032.4%
Annualized edge QQQ +14.9% +19.6%
Price return edge QQQ +459.1% +912.5%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 19.0% 19.2%
Max drawdown edge MTUM (slight) −31.9% −35.1%
Downside capture 101.7% 100.2%
Beta 1.02 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QQQ 0.73 0.93
Sortino edge QQQ 1.07 1.41
Treynor 0.135 0.145
Calmar edge QQQ 0.47 0.56
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.3% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.53 −0.58
Information ratio 0.17 −0.10
Tracking error 9.3% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: MTUM against MLRG, Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; QQQ against QQQM, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QQQ returned more: +1,032.4% to +554.7%. MTUM and QQQ swung about the same: 19.0% and 19.2%. MTUM fell slightly less at its worst: −31.9% to −35.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MTUM vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMQQQEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+554.7%+1,032.4%QQQPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.9%+19.6%QQQTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+459.1%+912.5%QQQPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.0%19.2%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.0%12.7%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.9%−35.1%MTUM (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture106.2%100.4%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture101.7%100.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.021.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.761.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.730.93QQQReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.071.41QQQReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1350.145Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.470.56QQQAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkMLRGQQQMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.3% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.53−0.58Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.7% to +6.3%−0.4% to +0.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.17−0.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.3%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 704 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

32%

By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and QQQ hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

32% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MTUM QQQ
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.00% 4.50%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 6.06% 3.93%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.62% 2.92%
INTEL CORPORATION 3.92% 2.12%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.07% 2.72%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.64% 1.89%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 2.88% 1.41%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.53% 1.35%
LAM RESEARCH 1.89% 1.29%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT 1.43% 1.21%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 1.83% 1.18%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY 2.02% 0.92%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MTUM
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.45%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.96%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP 2.22%
COCA-COLA 1.98%
CATERPILLAR INC 1.92%
DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC CLASS C 1.89%
MERCK & CO INC 1.81%
CHEVRON 1.65%
Only in QQQ
NVIDIA Corp 8.17%
Apple Inc 7.88%
Microsoft Corp 6.14%
Amazon.com Inc 4.25%
Tesla Inc 3.33%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.87%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 2.74%
Broadcom Inc 2.53%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +18.4% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (MLRG) +15.2% (QQQM)
Gap to its benchmark +4.8 pts vs MLRG 0.0 pts vs QQQM
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 93.2% 95.7%
Holdings 126 103
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $18.7bn $483.0bn

MTUM and QQQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-EA748AD14E

MTUM and QQQ do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. MTUM follows MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index and QQQ follows Nasdaq-100 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 32% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MTUM returned +18.4% and QQQ +15.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MTUM and QQQ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

QQQ

QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or QQQ?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +18.4% and QQQ +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, MTUM or QQQ?
MTUM is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MTUM and QQQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 93% of MTUM and 96% of QQQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MTUM against QQQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-qqq

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.