Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MTUM vs XOVR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MTUM returned +18.4% to XOVR's −3.0%; 4% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MTUM and XOVR
Net assets: $18.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF, and $2.2bn on Jun 30, 2026 for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.
Pair scorecard
MTUM costs 1.66 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 21.4 points.
| Measure | MTUM | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +18.4% | −3.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 11.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | 6.5%, high on Oct 5, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 1.81% |
| Net assets, MTUM as of Oct 27, 2026 and XOVR as of Jun 30, 2026 | $18.7bn | $2.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 4% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 35.5% | 63.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 17, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 466 weekly returnsMTUM returned more: +217.9% to +138.8%. MTUM swung less: 21.8% to 26.7%. MTUM fell less at its worst: −31.9% to −56.3%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MTUM | XOVR | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +217.9% | +138.8% | MTUM | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +13.8% | +10.2% | MTUM | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +187.1% | +37.1% | MTUM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 21.8% | 26.7% | MTUM | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 14.9% | 18.5% | MTUM | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −31.9% | −56.3% | MTUM | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.58 | 0.40 | MTUM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.84 | 0.57 | MTUM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.43 | 0.18 | MTUM | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 466 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and XOVR hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
4% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
MTUM and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.
MTUM
MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XOVR
XOVR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.81% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or XOVR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +18.4% and XOVR −3.0%.
- Which is cheaper, MTUM or XOVR?
- MTUM is cheaper, by 1.66 percentage points a year. That is about $166 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MTUM against XOVR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-xovr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MTUM against XOVR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-xovr
[MTUM against XOVR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-xovr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.