Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MINT vs VTV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to VTV's +23.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MINT and VTV

Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $184.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF.

At a glance
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
+23.5%
VTV total return, 1 year
0.36%
MINT expense ratio
0.03%
VTV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTV costs 0.33 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.3 points.

MINT vs VTV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMINTVTV
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.2%+23.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMorningstar US Large Cap Value Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.36%0.03%
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and VTV as of Sep 30, 2026$16.4bn$184.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight98%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund23.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and VTV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MINT VTV
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Only in VTV
Micron Technology Inc 4.56%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.33%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.92%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.56%
Johnson & Johnson 2.42%
AbbVie Inc 1.75%
Walmart Inc 1.72%
Chevron Corp 1.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund VTV Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of US value
Total return, 1 year +4.2% +23.5%
Expense ratio 0.36% 0.03%
Holdings 977 300
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and VTV as of Sep 30, 2026 $16.4bn $184.2bn

MINT and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

VTV

VTV tracks an index of US value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 300 positions, with the top ten at 23.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or VTV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and VTV +23.5%.
Which is cheaper, MINT or VTV?
VTV is cheaper, by 0.33 percentage points a year. That is about $33 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MINT against VTV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-vtv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.