Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PULS vs VTV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to VTV's +23.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PULS and VTV
Net assets: $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF, and $184.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF.
Pair scorecard
VTV costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.5 points.
| Measure | PULS | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.0% | +23.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Morningstar US Large Cap Value Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTV as of Sep 30, 2026 | $19.8bn | $184.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 98% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 23.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Apr 20, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 444 weekly returnsVTV returned more: +165.5% to +32.2%. PULS swung less: 1.9% to 17.1%. PULS fell less at its worst: −5.9% to −34.0%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | PULS | VTV | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +32.2% | +165.5% | VTV | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +3.3% | +12.1% | VTV | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −0.9% | +114.9% | VTV | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 1.9% | 17.1% | PULS | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 1.6% | 12.3% | PULS | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −5.9% | −34.0% | PULS | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.27 | 0.59 | VTV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.32 | 0.83 | VTV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.57 | 0.36 | PULS | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 444 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PULS and VTV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PULS and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 124 days apart.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
VTV
VTV tracks an index of US value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 300 positions, with the top ten at 23.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PULS or VTV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and VTV +23.5%.
- Which is cheaper, PULS or VTV?
- VTV is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PULS against VTV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-vtv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PULS against VTV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-vtv
[PULS against VTV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-vtv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.