Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGDV vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to MINT's +4.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGDV and MINT

Net assets: $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.

At a glance
+15.8%
CGDV total return, 1 year
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.36%
MINT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

CGDV costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.6 points.

CGDV vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVMINT
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.8%+4.2%
Drawdown
Below its high3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.33%0.36%
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026$39.1bn$16.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and MINT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGDV MINT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGDV
Microsoft Corp 7.64%
NVIDIA Corp 6.32%
Broadcom Inc 4.67%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.27%
Alphabet Inc 3.55%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 3.49%
Oracle Corp 3.22%
RTX Corp 3.16%
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +15.8% +4.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −11.7 pts vs IWD not measured
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.36%
Holdings 53 977
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 $39.1bn $16.4bn

CGDV and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGDV

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or MINT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and MINT +4.2%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or MINT?
CGDV is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-mint

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.