Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWD vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWD returned +27.5% to MINT's +4.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWD and MINT

Net assets: $83.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF, and $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.

At a glance
+27.5%
IWD total return, 1 year
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
0.18%
IWD expense ratio
0.36%
MINT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWD costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 23.3 points.

IWD vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWDMINT
Return
Total return, 1 year+27.5%+4.2%
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 Value IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.18%0.36%
Net assets, IWD as of Oct 27, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026$83.0bn$16.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight90%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWD and MINT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWD MINT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWD
APPLE 6.08%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.95%
MICROSOFT 5.21%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.67%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.37%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.96%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.71%
WALMART 1.26%
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
Issuer iShares PIMCO
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 value Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +27.5% +4.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.7% (VONV) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VONV not measured
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.36%
Holdings 871 977
Net assets, IWD as of Oct 27, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 $83.0bn $16.4bn

IWD and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWD flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWD

IWD tracks the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.5% with distributions reinvested, against +27.7% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 871 positions, with the top ten at 29.6%.

MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWD or MINT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.5% and MINT +4.2%.
Which is cheaper, IWD or MINT?
IWD is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWD against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-mint

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.