Which returned more over the last year, MINT or TLT?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.4% and TLT returned −6.4%, so MINT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MINT or TLT?

MINT charges 0.36% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so TLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MINT vs TLT: how they differ

MINT and TLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MINT returned more over the year.

PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MINT	Only in TLT
United States Treasury 6.51%	TREASURY BOND (2OLD) 4.16%
Fannie Mae 1.18%	TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.05%
Freddie Mac 1.04%	TREASURY BOND (OTR) 1.03%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.91%	TREASURY BOND 0.02%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.81%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.81%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.75%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

MINT and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund	TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PIMCO	iShares
What it is	Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad	20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year	+4.4%	−6.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−13.1 pts	−23.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.36%	0.15%
Holdings	977	41

MINT in plain words

MINT is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 977 positions, with the top ten at 14.1%.

TLT in plain words

TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or TLT?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.4% and TLT returned −6.4%, so MINT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MINT or TLT?: MINT charges 0.36% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so TLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MINT against TLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MINT against TLT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-tlt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources