Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
EDV vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EDV returned −13.3% to MINT's +4.2%, and EDV charges 0.05% to MINT's 0.36%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EDV and MINT
Net assets: $3.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF, and $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.
Pair scorecard
EDV costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.5 points.
| Measure | EDV | MINT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −13.3% | +4.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 57.0%, high on Mar 9, 2020 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2030 Year Equal Par Bond Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.36% |
| Net assets, EDV as of Sep 30, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 | $3.6bn | $16.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 27, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 882 weekly returnsMINT returned slightly more: +42.4% to +38.5%. MINT swung less: 1.1% to 20.3%. MINT fell less at its worst: −4.6% to −59.7%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | EDV | MINT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +38.5% | +42.4% | MINT (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +1.9% | +2.1% | MINT (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −41.3% | +0.5% | MINT | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 20.3% | 1.1% | MINT | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 14.1% | 1.0% | MINT | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −59.7% | −4.6% | MINT | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.12 | 0.50 | MINT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.17 | 0.59 | MINT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.03 | 0.46 | MINT | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 882 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EDV and MINT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
EDV and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EDV and MINT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. EDV follows Bloomberg U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2030 Year Equal Par Bond Index and MINT follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EDV returned −13.3% and MINT +4.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 17.5 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
EDV
EDV tracks an index of Extended Duration Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −13.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 57.0% below its high of Mar 9, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
MINT
MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EDV or MINT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EDV returned −13.3% and MINT +4.2%.
- Which is cheaper, EDV or MINT?
- EDV is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EDV against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/edv-vs-mint
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). EDV against MINT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/edv-vs-mint
[EDV against MINT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/edv-vs-mint)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.