MGK vs QGRO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MGK and QGRO hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and MGK returned +11.9% over the year. Net assets: $34.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF, and $2.2bn on May 31, 2026 for American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF.
MGK costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.1 points.
| MGK | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.29% |
| Net assets, MGK as of Sep 30, 2026 and QGRO as of May 31, 2026 | $34.9bn | $2.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.9% | +2.8% |
| What it tracks | Morningstar US Mega Cap Growth Index | American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 27% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 64.5% | 30.9% |
| Below its high | 4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MGK and QGRO hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
27% in common
On the same fields
MGK and QGRO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About MGK
MGK tracks an index of Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +11.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About QGRO
QGRO tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 189 positions, with the top ten at 30.9%.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MGK or QGRO?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MGK returned +11.9% and QGRO +2.8%.
- Which is cheaper, MGK or QGRO?
- MGK is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MGK against QGRO, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mgk-vs-qgro
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). MGK against QGRO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mgk-vs-qgro
[MGK against QGRO (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mgk-vs-qgro)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.