Are MFUT and VOO in the same category?

MFUT is an alternatives ETF and VOO is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.

Which returned more over the last year, MFUT or VOO?

In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MFUT returned +22.8% and VOO +14.8%.

Which is cheaper, MFUT or VOO?

VOO is cheaper, by 0.86 percentage points a year. That is about $86 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Across categories

MFUT vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MFUT returned +22.8% to VOO's +14.8%, and VOO charges 0.03% to MFUT's 0.89%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MFUT and VOO

Net assets: $39m on Jun 30, 2026 for Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF, and $1.0tn on Oct 31, 2026 for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF.

MFUT on its own →VOO on its own →

At a glance

+22.8%

MFUT total return, 1 year

+14.8%

VOO total return, 1 year

0.89%

MFUT expense ratio

0.03%

VOO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VOO costs 0.86 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.0 points.

MFUT vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	MFUT	VOO
Return
Measure	MFUT	VOO
Total return, 1 year	+22.8%	+14.8%
Total return, 52 weeks	+22.8%
Against its benchmark
Measure	MFUT	VOO
What it tracks	not published	S&P 500 Index
Treasury bills, 52 weeks	+3.7%
Against cash	19.1 points ahead
Cost and size
Measure	MFUT	VOO
Expense ratio	0.89%	0.03%
Net assets, MFUT as of Jun 30, 2026 and VOO as of Oct 31, 2026	$39m	$1.0tn
Holdings
Measure	MFUT	VOO
Holdings in common	not published
In the S&P 500, by weight		100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund		39.1%
Risk
Measure	MFUT	VOO
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns	+0.54
Beta to the S&P 500	+0.74: about 0.74% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fell	fell 0.96%
Down-week capture	89.9%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell	26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

MFUT Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Where it sits Alternatives ETF Stock ETF

Issuer Cambria Vanguard

What it is Managed futures Tracks the S&P 500

Total return, 1 year +22.8% +14.8%

Its benchmark over the same days not measured +14.8% (IVV)

Gap to its benchmark not measured 0.0 pts vs IVV

Expense ratio 0.89% 0.03%

Holdings not read by ETFIQ 505

Net assets, MFUT as of Jun 30, 2026 and VOO as of Oct 31, 2026 $39m $1.0tn

MFUT and VOO on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

MFUT

MFUT is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.54 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.74, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.74% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks MFUT fell 0.96% on average, a down-week capture of 89.9%. Over the same 52 weeks MFUT returned +22.8% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 19.1 percentage points ahead of cash.

VOO

VOO tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%.

Questions people ask

Are MFUT and VOO in the same category?: MFUT is an alternatives ETF and VOO is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, MFUT or VOO?: In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MFUT returned +22.8% and VOO +14.8%.
Which is cheaper, MFUT or VOO?: VOO is cheaper, by 0.86 percentage points a year. That is about $86 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

MFUT vs SPY IVV vs MFUT MFUT vs QQQ MFUT vs TLT ASMF vs VOO CTA vs VOO DBMF vs VOO HFMF vs VOO

Where to next

BIL, the T-bill fund these are measured against →SPY, the S&P 500 fund these are measured against →MFUT on its own →VOO on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →MFUT dividend history →VOO dividend history →VOO holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

MFUT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

MFUT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Cambria website ↗

VOO filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

VOO prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Vanguard page for VOO ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MFUT against VOO, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mfut-vs-voo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.