MDYV vs SDOG: how they differ

MDYV and SDOG hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and SDOG returned +20.4% over the year. State Street SPDR S & P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF.

MDYV costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.0 points; MDYV is 2.0 times larger.

MDYVSDOG
Expense ratio0.15%0.36%
Net assets, MDYV as of Oct 8, 2026 and SDOG as of May 31, 2026$2.7bn$1.4bn
Total return, 1 year+10.4%+20.4%
Holdings in common1%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund11.0%26.2%
Below its high7.1%, high on Aug 14, 20266.5%, high on Aug 19, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+10.4%
MDYV total return, 1 year
+20.4%
SDOG total return, 1 year
0.15%
MDYV expense ratio
0.36%
SDOG expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MDYV and SDOG hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

1% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding MDYV SDOG
WATSCO INC 0.61% 1.88%
Only in MDYV
TD SYNNEX CORP 1.30%
US FOODS HOLDING CORP 1.27%
RELIANCE INC 1.23%
PERMIAN RESOURCES CORP CL A 1.16%
HF SINCLAIR CORP 1.13%
OVINTIV INC 1.06%
WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC 1.05%
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA 1.01%
Only in SDOG
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co 3.76%
Texas Instruments Inc 3.02%
Microchip Technology Inc 2.88%
Ford Motor Co 2.82%
Hp Inc 2.69%
Best Buy Co Inc 2.35%
Cvs Health Corp 2.25%
T Rowe Price Group Inc 2.23%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

MDYV
State Street SPDR S & P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +10.4% +20.4%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −6.9 pts +3.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.36%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 97.6%
Holdings 296 50
Net assets, MDYV as of Oct 8, 2026 and SDOG as of May 31, 2026 $2.7bn $1.4bn

MDYV and SDOG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

MDYV in plain words

MDYV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +10.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 296 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

SDOG in plain words

SDOG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 26.2%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MDYV or SDOG?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MDYV returned +10.4% and SDOG +20.4%.
Which is cheaper, MDYV or SDOG?
MDYV is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $21. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MDYV and SDOG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of MDYV and 98% of SDOG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, MDYV against SDOG, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mdyv-vs-sdog

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.