Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MDY vs XBI: how they differ

MDY and XBI hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and XBI returned more over the year.

SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MDY and XBI hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MDY and XBI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMDYXBI
United Therapeutics Corporation0.61%0.89%
Roivant Sciences Ltd.0.52%1.39%
Neurocrine Biosciences Inc.0.45%0.94%
Exelixis Inc.0.41%1.05%
Halozyme Therapeutics Inc.0.36%1.47%
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.0.36%1.13%
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc.0.33%1.13%
Cytokinetics Incorporated0.28%1.06%
Krystal Biotech Inc.0.26%1.07%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MDYOnly in XBI
Twilio Inc. Class A 1.00%MODERNA INC 2.87%
Illumina Inc. 0.86%TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORP 1.81%
TechnipFMC plc 0.86%NATERA INC 1.46%
Everpure Inc. Class A 0.84%KYMERA THERAPEUTICS INC 1.45%
Okta Inc. Class A 0.81%TRAVERE THERAPEUTICS INC 1.40%
U.S. Dollar 0.80%ORUKA THERAPEUTICS INC 1.38%
ATI Inc 0.77%REVOLUTION MEDICINES INC 1.36%
nVent Electric plc 0.71%PRAXIS PRECISION MEDICINES I 1.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

MDY and XBI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust
XBI
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetState Street
What it isS&P MidCap 400SPDR S&P Biotech
Total return, 1 year+13.0%+64.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.5 pts+46.5 pts
Expense ratio0.23%0.35%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%8.5%
Holdings401154

MDY in plain words

MDY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 7.9%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XBI in plain words

XBI is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Biotech. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +64.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 8% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 154 positions, with the top ten at 15.9%. It sat 9.6% below its high of Feb 8, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MDY or XBI?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MDY returned +13.0% and XBI returned +64.0%, so XBI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MDY or XBI?
MDY charges 0.23% a year and XBI charges 0.35%, so MDY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MDY and XBI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of MDY and 8% of XBI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MDY against XBI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MDY against XBI, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mdy-vs-xbi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources